股權轉讓法律意見書怎麼寫（精選3篇）

股權轉讓法律意見書怎麼寫 篇1

致：________股份有限公司

________律師事務所(以下簡稱“本所”)接受A股份有限公司(以下簡稱“A公司”)的委託，指派________律師、________律師(以下簡稱“本所律師”)擔任A公司的特聘專項法律顧問，根據《中華人民共和國證券法》、《中華人民共和國公司法》、《上海證券交易所股票上市規則》(以下簡稱“《上市規則》”)，以及其他有關法律、法規的規定，就A公司向B股份有限公司(下簡稱“B公司”)轉讓其持有的C股份有限公司(下簡稱“C公司”)法人股股權事宜(下簡稱“本次股權轉讓”)，出具本法律意見書。

本所律師根據本法律意見書出具日之前已經發生或存在的事實，根據我國現行法律、法規和規範性文件的要求對本次股權轉讓的合法性及相關法律問題發表法律意見，法律意見書中不存在虛假、嚴重誤導性陳述及重大遺漏，否則願意承擔相應的法律責任。

本法律意見書僅就本次股權轉讓有關的法律問題發表意見，並不對有關會計、審計、資產評估等專業事項發表意見。

本所律師就A公司本次股權轉讓所涉及的有關問題進行了必要的審慎調查，對與出具法律意見書有關的事項及文件資料進行了審查。

本所律師在出具法律意見書之前，業已得到A公司的承諾和保證，即：A公司已向本所律師提供了爲出具法律意見書所必需的、真實的、完整的、有效的原始書面材料、副本材料或口頭證言，並無任何隱瞞、虛假、重大遺漏或誤導之處。上述所提供的材料如爲副本或複印件，則保證與正本或原件相符。

本法律意見書僅供A公司爲本次股權轉讓之目的而使用，非經本所同意，不得用作任何其他目的。

股權轉讓法律意見書怎麼寫 篇2

律師法律意見書英文版

Sample Attorney Opinion Letter

Date

（Name of Client）

President

Co., Ltd

City, State, ZIP code

Re： Opinion Letter Regarding （name of employee, e.g., fictitious ）

Dear （Name）：

After our initial meeting, I reviewed the papers you sent me regarding the matter. As I understand the situation, Ms. signed a written employment agreement with your company. The agreement stated that in the event of termination or resignation from her job as your sales associate, Ms. would not call upon or sell goods to any of your customers for a period of one year.

You have asked me to advise you about your rights, the chance of success, the amount of damages that may be recoverable, the costs involved, and my ability to represent you in this matter.

RIGHTS OF AGAINST MS.

When Ms. signed a written contract with your company, she agreed not to call upon any of your customers for a period of one year. This is called a restrictive covenant. To enforce your covenant against Ms., you must bring an action against her and prove your case. You have a choice of forums in which to bring the action： federal district court or a state court. Since it is easier to obtain an injunction （an action to immediately stop her from selling to your customers） in a state court rather than a federal court, I would suggest the state court.

I must advise you that injunctions are largely discretionary with the court, and there are several factors here that might lead it not to grant one on your behalf. Since you waited eight months before threatening to sue Ms. , my guess is that you have about a twenty percent （20%） chance of obtaining an injunction.

RIGHTS TO AND AMOUNT OF DAMAGES

Your chances of obtaining money damages against Ms. are much greater than your chances for an injunction. From our discussion and the facts and evidence suggested in your papers, it appears that the amount of recoverable damages would be measured by the profits you have lost since the time Ms. began selling competitive products to your customers.

It should be understood that if we win our case, however, Ms. may not voluntarily pay the judgment. Thus, it may be necessary to enforce the judgment by having a sheriff or marshall seize and sell assets not exempt from execution. However, if Ms. does not own assets, such as real estate, money in bank accounts, stocks, etc., but owns only personal items exempt from execution under the laws of our state, then any judgment you obtain may not be worth much.

NEGATIVES TO LAWSUIT

Besides the fact that you may lose a lawsuit against Ms. or that any judgment obtained may be uncollectible, there are other negative factors you should consider before bringing a lawsuit. These include court costs and attorney fees. Court costs are recoverable, but other costs, such as travel, the time lost when you are called to testify （or required to help us develop the case）, and attorney fees, are not recoverable.

MY SERVICES

I am familiar with the nature of your manufacturing business and am qualified to represent you in this matter if you choose to proceed. My fee would be based on my normal hourly charge of $250 for myself and $150 for associates. Trial time is billed at $1,000 per day. The initial services of preparing a complaint and serving same would cost approximately $300. Preparing a request for an injunction and attending a hearing on the injunction would cost approximately $2,500.

It is quite possible that Ms. would not retain her own counsel and not answer the complaint. This means that a default judgment could be taken without the necessity of a trial. Here attorney fees would probably amount to no more than $1,000.

I require a $1,000 retainer to open a file and commence an action.

If you wish to proceed with this matter, I will need to know the full names and addresses of your customers to whom Ms. is presently selling and the estimated sales volume which you have lost.

If you have any questions, please call me.

Very truly yours,

Name of Attorney

股權轉讓法律意見書怎麼寫 篇3

華川有限*司2020__年度第次股東臨時大會之法律意見書

致：華川有限*司

根據《中華人民共和國公司法》(以下簡稱《公司法》)，現行有效的《華川有限*司章程》(以下簡稱《公司章程》)的有關規定，河北*威律師事務所(以下簡稱“本所”)接受華川有限*司的委託，指派本所曹*立律師列席了20__年華川有限*司第次臨時股東大會(以下簡稱“本次股東大會”)，對本次股東大會的會議召集及召開程序、出席會議人員資格、會議表決程序等事項進行見證，並依法出具法律意見書。

在本法律意見書中，本所律師根據《公司法》及《公司章程》，僅對本次臨時股東大會的召集、召開程序、出席會議的人員資格、會議的表決程序和表決結果事項發表法律意見。

本法律意見書僅供見證公司本次股東大會相關事項的合法性之目的使用，不得用作任何其他目的。

本所律師審查了公司提供的文件：

(一)《公司章程》;

(二)公司第屆董事會第次會議決議;

(三)20__年 月 日華川有限*司關於召開本次股東大會通知、回執及公告;

(四)公司本次股東大會股東到會登記記錄及憑證資料;

(五)公司本次股東大會股東表決情況憑證資料;

本所律師根據相關法律法規的要求，按照律師行業公認的業務標準、道德規範和勤勉盡責精神，出席了本次股東大會，並對公司本次股東大會的召集及召開程序等有關事項及公司提供的文件進行了覈查檢驗，出具如下法律意見：

一、本次股東大會的召集、召開程序：

本次股東大會由公司第 屆董事會第 次會議決議召集，本次股東大會於20__年月 日以 方式通知了全體股東，同時在 發佈公告。通知及公告中包括本次股東大會的召開時間和地點、會議議題、參加人員、參加辦法等相關事項。

本次股東大會召開會議的基本情況如下：

會議召集人：公司董事會;

會議主持人：董事長

會議投票方式：現場投票並在會議記錄上簽字確認;

現場會議召開的日期、時間：20__年*月*日點00分;

現場會議召開地點：本公司會議室;

會議審議事項：1、選舉新一屆董事會成員2、選舉新一屆監事會成員3、修改相關工商登記4、關於決議

經本所律師見證，本次股東大會實際召開的時間、地點、方式等與通知內容一致。本所律師認爲，本次股東大會的召集、召開程序符合相關法律法規及《公司章程》的規定，公司董事會作爲召集人的資格合法、有效。

二、出席本次臨時股東大會人員及會議召集人資格：

(一)出席本次股東大會的股東及股東代表爲、，共計 人，代表股份 股，佔公司股份 比例;

(二)本所律師列席了本次臨時股東大會。

(三)本次股東大會由公司董事會召集由董事長主持，其作爲本次股東大會召集人和主持人的資格合法有效。

經本所律師覈查，上述出席本次股東大會的人員資格符合相關法律法規及《公司章程》的規定，

三、本次股東大會表決程序及表決結果

(一)本次股東大會的表決程序

本次股東大會現場會議對通知所列議案進行審議，並以舉手表決簽字確認的方式現場進行了表決，舉手同意的股東在股東會議記錄上簽字，未簽字的股東對決議內容表示棄權。本所律師見證了會議表決全過程。

(二)本次股東大會的表決結果如下：

四、本次股東大會審議通過了以下公司決議議案：

根據統計結果，以上議案由參加會議有表決權股東所持有效表決權三分之二以上同意通過。

本所律師認爲本次股東大會的表決程序符合《公司法》等法律法規的規定，符合《公司章程》有關規定，表決結果合法、有效。

五、結論意見

綜上所述，本所律師認爲，本次股東大會的召集和召開程序、出席會議人員和召集人資格、會議提案、表決程序、表決結果符合相關法律法規及《公司章程》的規定，本次股東大會通過的決議合法、有效。